Summer comparison

Scottsdale,
Arizona.

Three summer months.
A different revenue picture.

This five-bedroom estate opened in April 2025. Mira took over pricing in late August 2025, after the first summer in the comparison.

Rental revenue for May–July rose from $30,858 in 2025 to $49,014 in 2026, an increase of $18,156 or 58.8%. Local market RevPAR declined 9.0% over the same months.

FIVE-BEDROOM ESTATEONE PROPERTYJOINED LATE AUGUST 2025

Selected result; outcomes vary. Revenue before service fees and operating costs. Source records await validation.

Same property. Same three months.

+58.8%

May–July 2025 vs. May–July 2026
Rental revenue, before service fees and operating costs.

+$18,156

Observed rental-revenue change across May–July.

88% → 99%

Reported property occupancy, up 11 percentage points.

−9.0%

Local market RevPAR change over the same months.

The comparison in detail

Three months.
Every month in view.

Rental revenue was higher in each of the 3 matched months. The charts keep the calendar periods consistent and the measures separate.

RENTAL REVENUE

Month by month.

20252026

May–July 2025 vs. May–July 2026.

Monthly rental revenue in dollars. Exact values are available in the data table below.
View the revenue data
Monthly rental revenue in dollars
Month20252026
May$10,792$18,912
Jun$10,260$15,080
Jul$9,806$15,022
Total$30,858$49,014

OCCUPANCY

The property.

May–July in both years. The source describes local market occupancy as approximately 60%, without a separate before-and-after pair.

View the occupancy data
Reported occupancy in comparable periods
Measure20252026
The property88%99%

Available-night definitions and blocked-night treatment require source confirmation before publication.

Source: Mira client-results draft, November 2026 . Displayed arithmetic checked; underlying source records await validation. Selected individual results; outcomes vary.

Scottsdale, Arizona location imagery, not the client property

Location photography: Scottsdale, Arizona. Logan Voss / Unsplash. Not the client property.

The property context

Summer demand.
Property-specific decisions.

Read the pricing story alongside the age of the listing.

The 2026 revenue total was higher in each of the three matched months. May increased from $10,792 to $18,912; June from $10,260 to $15,080; July from $9,806 to $15,022.

Reported property occupancy increased from 88% to 99%. The source describes local market occupancy as about 60% during the summer comparison.

The listing was new in the 2025 baseline. Building reviews and gaining operating history can contribute to growth, so the result cannot be attributed to pricing alone.

The baseline is the first summer of a new listing. Growth includes factors beyond pricing.

The reported management approach

Specific decisions.
Ongoing attention.

The source describes pricing and stay-rule adjustments. These are reported actions, rather than a test of what caused the revenue change.

01 / DATE-SPECIFIC FLOORS

Treat weekdays and peak dates differently.

Reported floors were higher on event and holiday weekends and lower on selected midweek dates.

02 / SHORTER GAPS

Adjust stay rules deliberately.

The account describes opening two-night stays on gaps that previously required four nights, with a 15% short-stay premium.

03 / FORWARD DEMAND

Review pace and positioning.

The source reports 10% increases when distant weekends booked early, larger event premiums, and small 5% reductions on softer dates.

300+

reported pricing moves

Reported since August 2025. The activity window is broader than the May–July revenue comparison.

A transparent comparison

What these
numbers show.

May–July 2025 vs. May–July 2026. The baseline is the first summer of a new listing. Growth includes factors beyond pricing.

Property and period
Five-bedroom estate in Scottsdale, Arizona. May–July 2025 vs. May–July 2026. Mira management began late August 2025.
Revenue definition
Reported nightly accommodation revenue, excluding cleaning fees and taxes, before Mira service fees and operating costs. It is not owner profit, a net return, or a guaranteed result.
The calculation
$49,014 − $30,858 = $18,156. Dividing the increase by $30,858 gives 58.8%, rounded to one decimal place.
Source, comparison, and limitations

One five-bedroom estate. May–July 2025 predates Mira; the same months of 2026 follow the late-August 2025 management start.

The property opened in April 2025. Review accumulation and listing maturation are material parts of the comparison.

The source reports occupancy of 88% and 99% for the property. Its approximate 60% market figure is not a separate annual pair and is not rendered as two market bars.

The source also reports a January–October RevPAR index and saved market rank. Those use different or unrefreshed evidence and are omitted from this summer comparison.

The Mira client-results draft uses RCC and PriceLabs data through October 2026. Monthly values reconcile to the displayed totals; underlying reservation records and adjustment logs have not been independently validated.

Other property changes, availability, marketing, and demand can affect a comparison. These selected stories do not establish causal attribution, typical results, owner profit, or a return on Mira's fees. Client identities remain anonymous.

Photography shows the stated location, not the anonymous client's property.

Draft evidence for review · Source records await validation before public release.

Start with your numbers

What could a closer
look reveal?

Bring your property details, current approach, and performance questions. Let's discuss the revenue management support your business needs.

Request a revenue assessment ← Back to client results